Everyone knows the estate carries configuration, code and data from a shape the business has moved on from. Proving which parts — to the standard where someone will sign off retiring them — is the slow part.
Org structures configured for a business unit that closed. Z-programs written for a process that changed. Transactional data from customers you no longer have. It costs licence, infrastructure, storage and backup every single day, and none of it shows up as a decision anyone made.
Nobody signs off on deleting a Z-program on a suspicion, because the downside of being wrong is an outage and the upside is a rounding error on someone else’s budget. Without usage evidence, the safe answer is always to keep it — so it all stays.
Every migration scopes it. Every test cycle covers it. Every assessment counts it. You pay for the dead weight once in run cost, then again in every project that has to carry it across.
Z-objects and enhancements with no real usage behind them, identified by evidence rather than suspicion.
Enterprise structures configured but never actually operated.
Closed and inactive data identified by status, so it can be archived rather than carried.
The transactional proof behind every retirement candidate — the thing that makes sign-off possible.
Less licence, infrastructure, storage and backup for a system that does the same work.
Whatever you retire now is scope you never pay to carry across later.
Available now, whether or not S/4HANA is on your roadmap — this pays for itself on ECC.
Nobody signs off deleting a program on a suspicion — the downside is an outage and the upside is someone else’s budget. We show what is actually being used and what is not, so retirement becomes a decision instead of a risk.
20 minutes on your landscape. We will show what the usage evidence looks like on a real system.